Thank you for this article.

I do not agree with labeling anyone who's experiencing addiction directly or indirectly. We get to eliminate words like "addict", "co-dependent" and "enabler" among others. Labeling and stereotyping people that are in so much pain is flat out wrong as is referring to the process as a "family disease'.

I flat out disagree that the experience of addiction is 100% fatal or even a disease.

Addiction, properly understood, is neither a disease to be cured—though it has aspects of a disease—nor a problem to be eliminated. On the contrary, addiction is the individual’s attempt to solve a quandary. Before we can address addiction, this simple fact must be understood. What is the problem that addiction is meant to resolve?

As the Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards wrote about his own heroin habit, it can be a search for oblivion. He writes of “the contortions we go through just not to be ourselves for a few hours.”

Why would a person long to escape themselves? Because, as a result of their life experiences, they are intensely distressed and may feel trapped within their situation.

To put it another way, all the addictive substances (and addictive behaviors) soothe pain or at least distract from pain. Specifically, abusive substances like opiates are powerful painkillers, both physical and emotional; as is cocaine; as is alcohol.

Hence, the question is not why the addiction, but why the pain? And, again, the answer resides neither in genes nor in “choices,” but in the lives and experiences of the individual.

In truth the most common outcome for folks that experience addiction is resolution of the symptoms and improved dimensions of health. This gets to be shared, loudly and proudly.